Libertarian- It’s Not Easy Being Green

October 21st, 2010

Over the past weekend Beth and I attended the Environmental Media Awards held at the Warner Bros Lot. To some this might not make sense. What’s a libertarian doing at a such Hollywood green event? Libertarians are green. It’s just not easy being our kind of green.

This was a very Hollywood sort of event. With all the hybrids there it was one of the quietest valet drop offs I’ve ever used.  This was the place to be seen in your Prius but then there we were in our Ford Escape hybrid all wrapped as the campaign car. From the service items, to the filtered water served- senza plastic bottles, to the organic food and even the “healthy” vodka being served, it was all very green.  The guests of honor included notables such as Ted Turner, his ex, Jane Fonda and the quintessential Hollywood greenie, Ed Begley Jr..

This definitely was not a place for the politically timid. It was however a great place to be a libertarian, more than I could have expected.

For a quick take on the libertarian environmental philosophy, it boils down to promoting the power of the market and to defending property rights.  Check out these links for more information: Libertarian Party on Environment and Environment | Libertarian Party and Platform | Libertarian Party

In practice, I think the libertarian approach to environmental management and best use polices are exemplified by groups like the Surf Riders Foundation, Ducks Unlimited, the Sierra Mountain Conservancy.  Imagine how much more effective it would be if others like the Sierra Club or the World Wildlife Fund were focussed not on raising millions to influence government but instead spent their efforts on land purchases and management.

But I digress.

Even I though, thought that my take on being green would be ignored at the EMA.  The first minutes proved me wrong.

EMA President, Debbie Levin, concluded in her opening remarks and I’ll paraphrase, “we can’t trust Washington to do the right thing. We can’t control everything but we do control how we spend our money. That influences companies….”

Then the main corporate sponsor continued the libertarian approach. Senior VP of Toyota Motor North America, Dian Ogilvie, emphasized that the company was committed to bringing to market not just a great selection of models, but more importantly the largest variety of “green” solutions of any auto manufacturer. She emphasized it’s about providing different options on green- electric, hybrid and hydrogen.

Then came the biggest surprise.  Ted Turner received the Lifetime Achievement Award. That’s not it. He was introduced by Jane Fonda. Here it comes.  Jane, in pointing out his accomplishments in using the media to raise environmental awareness made much of Ted’s putting his money where his mouth is.  Ms. Fonda laid out how thorough and passionate Mr. Turner is as the conservator of his lands. She summed it all up by saying to the effect that she guessed this must be what real conservation looks like.

OK, there was plenty of the expected Hollywood vacuous comments. Ted Turner said all sorts of great things but then ended lamenting the Senate was not doing enough. James Cameron, after winning for Avatar whined on about big Texas oil companies’ support for Prop 23 that would temporarily suspend the Ca. Climate Final Solution Bill, while conveniently ignoring the even bigger money from the single solar energy investor funding his side the no on 23 group.  Nonetheless, the overall tenor of the evening had surprisingly strong libertarian under tones which were music to my political ears.

What an election year.  From the “right” and the “left” people are getting it. The classic liberalism of our founding fathers: reliance on individual liberty, support of market solutions and the importance of a limited government is as powerful as ever.

I’m ready for a little political revolution this November 2. How about you?

So this is where I better make it clear, I never did get to that “healthy” vodka.

Beginning October 23, you can catch the event out yourself at http://www.youtube.com/user/NationalGeographic

Miller, Waxman & Wilkerson – The Virtual Debate of Ca. Congressional District 30

October 12th, 2010

Erich Miller (L) Henry Waxman (D-incumbent) "Chuck" Wilkerson (R)

Since neither of my opponents will either answer calls from local organizations or make time to appear at live events, and as important as it is for the voters to see and hear their choices, I created a solution, a virtual debate.

Please note all visual and audio content was either  taken at public events or used from public posts by the candidate or the candidate’s authorized committee sponsored sites. Editing has been limited to keeping responses to a specific subject as best as possible. That apple to apples- oranges to oranges thing.

What is important to you in this race/election year?


(Sorry  for the still pic. The video portion of Chuck Wilkerson from this event was too poor.)

What do you bring to the job as our Representative and/or what is your role as our Congressman?


What are your views on the economy and the role government should play?



What is your position on Social Security and entitlements?

Why should people vote for you?




Now that you’ve seen and heard your candidates, what will you do in this free and open election?

Will we continue down the same road or are you willing to join me in steering this nation back on it’s course of freedom?

Affordability Act- Anything But!

September 21st, 2010

Who has gotten a recent statement from their employer’s health insurance provider?  Big shock I bet. All too often the premium has drastically jumped. I can hear the screams from here- What’s hapening!? Well this can’t be a surprise to anyone who has been following the debate. However, I am sure this is a big surprise to those who just listened to the media and Washington D.C. talking heads, taking in all they heard as fact.

Come on this is called the Affordable Care Act after all. What’s the deal? Where’s the affordability?

Reality is the deal. Like gravity to physics, costs are to the laws of human nature/the market. You cannot simply legislate them away.  Cost savings and controls can come only from a direct relationship between the consumer and provider. Instead even more distance has been forced on us.  Just as before we’re still stuck with their bill.

As a DailyFinance article stated, “And if the health care reform bill doesn’t really address the cost generators and the incentives built into the current system, then it’s difficult to see how costs can decline.”

What is the administration’s reply to this reality? Censor it and do it fast.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in a letter to America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), the national association of health insurers, made such a threat. Michael F. Cannon from the CATO Institute has written a couple of great blogs here and here detailing this threat.

The creators of this mess, Henry Waxman, Nancy Pelosi and the DC gang simply ignored all the causes of the current crises. They played their “politics as usual” card falling back on that career minded, politician mantra: if it’s not working- just do more of it.

They tied us deeper to a system that has no incentives for lowering costs of delivery or incentives to lower abuse including overuse of the system. The employer supported system, which is a “third party” pay system, has just been magnified. Compounding the problem, is that we really have a universal prepaid program.  As Penn Jillette recently put it on John Stossel’s Fox show, “if this was food, we’d have gourmet shops on every corner instead of grocery stores.” Not a budget friendly idea for sure.  Previous administrations also undermined the consumer when the Medicare/Medicaid system expanded and set policies like denying doctors the freedom to take cash paying patients. The Feds then compound the injury by making your adult children dependents until age 26! The Feds love dependency.

Their cure is killing us.

The real remedy?  Control back in the consumer’s hands and not the hands of big government or big businesses. Tax exempt spending and savings on all health care. Insurance policies belonging solely to the user. Another bonus to this practical approach is that coverage stays with the consumer regardless of employer. The user pays only for the coverage they need. Cut overhead and expenses by allowing the providers to offer cash services for regular care. Rely on catastrophic policies for emergencies and long term needs.

The losers? The work force inside the D.C Beltway. No more unknown number of new government agencies and jobs needed. The healthcare industry loses and wins. They’re forced to face the real costs the consumer will pay. However the overhead and political costs are gone but competition is back. It’s a tough love approach for them.

The winners?- Us. We the People who have been double paying the bill both as consumers and tax payers. We can finally can take back control for the medical care we want and need. Instead of one size fits all insurance where everyone is paying for everything possible, we pay for what we use. We get both the financial relief and portability we need.

This won’t happen though until we change Washington’s perspective. That won’t happen until we change the way we vote. That’s why I’m running as a Libertarian.

I have the independence to stand up for these reforms. I have the political freedom to follow through. We just need to vote different to make the difference on November 2.

Let’s Not Be Fooled Again

August 25th, 2010

Let’s keep our eye on the ball and not be fooled by the old “good cop bad cop” routine they, the two old parties, are playing on us yet again.

Under Reagan the Republicans:

  • boosted import tariffs and trade restrictions
  • cut marginal income tax rates, but they also raised Social Security taxes
  • increased farm subsidies
  • sent the federal debt through the roof
  • grew federal spending from $678 billion to $1.14 trillion
  • set the record for the highest average spending as a percent of GDP over his administration- although Obama is on track to beat him

Under Barack Obama unemployment has increased from 7.7 percent to 9.5 percent. However remember that during the first 18 months of the Republican control under Reagan unemployment increased from 7.5 percent to 9.8 percent. That’s even worse, but we don’t hear Rep. Tom Price or the so called Republican Study Committee mentioning it.

President Reagan said many great and true things. His party and Washington D.C. however,  just never lived up to them nor honored them. Don’t honor them with your votes.

It’s time we make these ideals reality. Can we afford not to?

Spread the word —Vote to Put Miller in Congress this November.

Consistency

August 17th, 2010

The thing about my libertarian perspective, different from Mr. Waxman’s or others both on the “right” or “left” is that it’s consistent on the welfare question.

All welfare, corporate, military, foreign or social should not be.

Playing favorites is not the role of government. Taking from one group to give to another is wrong. The goal is to keep government in its role as the referee.  The limited powers of the Constitution support this goal and pragmatism has proven the efficiency of this system.

From international questions to social concerns great minds like Washington and Madison had it right. But in the fight for these ideals it can still be surprising the strange “bed fellows” this approach creates. Paul & Frank.

This Works

August 6th, 2010

Congressman Miller, who in our district will meet the needs for low income housing in a consistent dependable way, that builds community, creates economic growth and is respectful of the individual’s involved? Habitat for Humanity.

At a recent work day here the site manager shared a telling story. In the very tired looking “public housing” apartments across the street, a tenant there came over to find out how to get help from HfH. She just got a raise at work. Good thing? No. The very small bump put her over the income cap. She had until the end of the month to either move the family out or loose the raise.

The wrong approach yields the wrong results.

In contrast, this growing Habitat neighborhood is full of growing successful families. Before the nay sayers jump on me I do realize government has a hand in this. Through streamlining permitting and approval processes, fees, and many times lowering or eliminating taxes, they get out of the way!

Not your thing? That’s what makes this even better. Not a single cent was forced from you to support this. No one is forced to go begging for political favor to get it done. You are left completely free to support your own favorite group.

A win win socially.

I go to Congress to Represent- maximizing you. I don’t need to go fighting for political favors to support one program over another. Instead I go to fight to insure you keep every dollar possible you’ve earned. In this case the homeowner benefits, the supporter has more money to give, the service organization has greater resources and the local government keeps more dollars at home.

A win win economically.

Happy Birthday America

July 3rd, 2010

My family and I have trekked halfway across the the country to spend this the 4th of July weekend with family and friends, enjoying great food, good times and of course, fireworks. I’m sure many are doing the same.

In this too “hectic” life in which we live, as I travel in my air conditioned car, checking email, staying in touch with work, checking news trying to stay on top of these complicated times, I’m given cause to reflect upon an even more difficult time in our history.  At a time when making a living was secondary to just trying to survive, in that more complicated time, the everyday citizen was still willing to take on the greatest political struggle our nation has ever experienced. They risked all they were and everything they owned to change their course as a people and to insure for their posterity a better society.

We’re all busy with work and the daily grind, but stopping to enjoy the 4th, wave some flags, and listen to patriotic music as we enjoy the overhead light show is a great diversion. Yet given the current state of our nation this election season, we must look far beyond the symbolism and realize the value and meaning of our founding principles.

In the muggy summer days of Philadelphia, PA, farmers, doctors, tradesmen, smiths, pastors–men from many professions, faiths and intentions–gathered to take ownership of their destiny. Unified as free men fighting for their freedom, they gave birth to our nation. No mistaking too, they were insurgents–terrorists to the status quo and government. With open eyes, this rag-tag group of inventors, artisans, philosophers and pragmatic thinkers declared their rebellion against the greatest military might of the day. What is most amazing about this bold act is that these citizen representatives had the courage and foresight to see how their long-term personal and economic security, safety and prosperity laid in the ideals of individual freedom. Their generation took on the full costs and risks. Nothing passed on. Nothing compromising. Nothing incremental. In simple language, because self-governing demands it, they openly declared…

“WHEN in the Course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation.

WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their endowed by their Creator with certain Rights, that among see are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness– That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying it’s Foundation on such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. prudence, indeed, will dictate t hat Government long established should not be changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all Experience hath sheen, that Mankind are mor disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security….”

Happy Birthday America!

Public Service

June 18th, 2010

“No nation ever protested its way from poverty to prosperity or got there through rhetoric or bureaucracies.”- Thomas Sowell

Real public service is in our everyday life not in government. Yet you can’t go through a single day without your life being forced to maneuver around and through political obstacles. They’re draining energy and potential from your work. That’s waste.

Government has a great purpose though. It’s the janitor. Integral to the running of the building called nation, yet not intrusive. Reliably there when called upon to keep the systems running, oversee disputes, and facilitate operations as asked. Thus insuring that the users are free to peacefully and safely pursue their lives as they see fit.

Representing us in Congress for me is not about doing more of the same but un-doing what’s in the way. It’s not about continuing the endless re-forming but instead re-turning. Returning Congress to its intended mission, so we are free to go about doing all the amazing things we do in real public service, providing for our families/selves and creating a vibrant economy.

Healthcare – Redo!

June 2nd, 2010

Why nothing really changed and why we need a different approach.

Most common criticism of our system’s results, the 6/21/2000 WHO report.  Yes it did list the US healthcare system as 37th out of 191 nations, however just as importantly it ranked the U.S. #1 “in responsiveness to the needs and choices of the individual patient.” At the time we were also listed as having the “shortest nonemergency surgery time.” It should be noted too that WHO stopped ranking due to the “complexity of the task.”  Another view from the WSJ article 1/7/10, M. Constantian points out, “The Nobel Prizes in medicine and physiology have been awarded to more Americans than to researchers in all other countries combined. Eight of the 10 top-selling drugs in the world were developed by U.S. companies. The U.S. has some of the highest breast, colon and prostate cancer survival rates in the world. And our country ranks first or second in the world in kidney transplants, liver transplants, heart transplants, total knee replacements, coronary artery bypass, and percutaneous coronary interventions.”

Bottom line, we need to promote what works and pinpoint only what’s failing. Broad sweeping measures risk throwing the baby out with the bath water.

Top complaints about what isn’t working, price controls and pre-existing conditions as it relates to portability.  I see them all as expected outcomes of related  problems:   reliance on health insurance tied to employment. Too often people feel stuck in a bad job just to keep their insurance. Since WWll, tax code has been used to all but institutionalize this cost driving practice. People too have grown dependent on the idea of this employer supported insurance coverage for even the most basic services. Instead to control costs, promoting a direct relationship of patient+provider, eliminating the middleman should be our goal. Moving the tax benefits exclusively to individuals is also a necessary step.  A system where health insurance stays with the user and not the employer will also go far in eliminating most of the “pre-existing condition” problems. Finally, in health care as in all goods and services, providing the best to the most for the least also does not require mandates.

Here’s someone else with my perspective, presenting facts in a clear concise way. Way to go Vijay!

Reflections on Memorial Day

June 2nd, 2010

(I posted this 5/28/10 on my Facebook page)As this weekend approaches I want to thank all those citizen soldiers who, when faced with the threat of tyranny and oppression, stood up to fight it head on, forsaking all the comforts and safety of home to protect our Liberty and ideals of individual freedom. All who have ever tried to strike at our foundation have underestimated the power and conviction of free people to defend their freedoms. On Memorial Day, remembering those fallen in places like Concord, Gettysburg, Normandy, Guam and the field in Stonycreek Township (United Airlines Flight 93) is also a reminder to ourselves that as a people, it is our character as Americans, transplanted from every corner of the earth, united as a culture by our love of liberty, that we will defend OUR freedoms. Thank you.